Beginning Life Forums
Forum Search:

Home » Public » Trans Political Issues » My son, the daughter (Give me that old 1966 phobia)
My son, the daughter [message #111071] Thu, 26 August 2010 11:42 Go to next message
pumpkin  is currently offline pumpkin  UNITED STATES
Messages: 662
Registered: July 2009
Senior Member
It's funny how the main character is presented as a good person who does nice things for others but his gayness (or transness, really) is just inherently funny.

This was 1966. Any of you remember that time? My mom was about 8 so I can't really recall Wink

http://themagicwhistle.blogspot.com/2010/08/my-son-daughter- part-1.html

http://themagicwhistle.blogspot.com/2010/08/my-son-daughter- part-2-of-2.html


http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_Ke7K_ISHPns/TGys08YemFI/AAAAAAAAFu0/2ei_fOX87Ms/s1600/8-19-6.jpg

Originally on Bilerico.
Re: My son, the daughter [message #111074 is a reply to message #111071 ] Thu, 26 August 2010 12:34 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Heli H  is currently offline Heli H  FINLAND
Messages: 2234
Registered: October 2007
Location: Siberian porch
Senior Member
I was 2-3 years old in 1966. Homosexuality was listed in Finnish criminal code, so people didn't talk about the subject in my childhood. It has not been a crime since 1971 and a disease since 1981. Untin 1970's they performed enforced involuntary sterilizations for mentally ill and disabled people.

Transsexuality was an unknown disease, classified as a perversion. In 1980's that was examined 6 months in closed wards. If you wanted to change your gender you had to lodge in a closed ward for that. I n 1990's it was the same but in open wards so you could work. In 2002 we got a new law that enabled much. But still if you want to maintain your marriage you have have it terminated to a civil union or you must remain in your birth gender in spite of your genital status.
Re: My son, the daughter [message #111180 is a reply to message #111071 ] Fri, 27 August 2010 15:40 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Capucine  is currently offline Capucine  UNITED STATES
Messages: 210
Registered: October 2007
Senior Member
Reflexions

I was 28 in 1966, so I should remember what conditions were like. Those cartoons seem to catch the general attitude towards homosexuality. One knew that it existed, but known homosexuals were rare indeed. It was mainly the pedophiles who were criminalized, rather than consenting adults.

One knew of homosexuality from school where in all boys or girls schools it was rife. Nature cannot be denied however man's prejudices demand it. It was just not practiced openly, which eliminated the need for aggressive homophobia.

On the other hand, one has to remember that homosexuality was not only against the law but more importantly considered as immoral. With so much State and religious condemnation no one needed to show homophobia. Homosexuality was generally accepted as being wrong. When you have the power of the State on your side there is no need to act aggressively when this can be safely left to the State.

The State has now changed sides, much to the chagrin of those whose moral standards still condemn homosexuality. Since morality trumps the law, these people act on their sense of right and wrong regardless of the law. Because the State is too powerful for them they turn their frustrations on the unfortunate defenseless individual.

As a comparison, adultery has been considered to be immoral in my lifetime. But I do not remember it being illegal. There is undoubtedly a minority who still hold it to be immoral. Their views are held strongly enough to make public demonstrations in support of their views. Private ostracization is the worst one can suffer as an adulterer. The homosexual still has half the population who condemns him as immoral, even if only privately.

The changes in the law have occurred due to the collapse of morality rather than any positive new system of morality, for which the law is setting out the practical consequences. The morality of the homophobes has not been abolished, merely suspended awaiting a clear theory of morality which will replace it. What moral theory justifies homosexuality? Any theory based on altruism does not. Rather it condemns homosexuals for not accepting the suffering arising as a benefit to others. The only system which would seem to work would be the 'self-perfection' theory, which is an egoistic morality. All the biblical type moralities, being based on altruism, are in absolute opposition as this supposes that the rights of the individual are superior to those of the community. No altruist can tolerate that under any pretext.

Re: My son, the daughter [message #111186 is a reply to message #111180 ] Fri, 27 August 2010 17:23 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Wendy C  UNITED STATES
Messages: 4340
Registered: October 2007
Location: Gateway to the West
Senior Member
BL3D
1966, rather hard to forget that year. Eighteen years old in Viet Nam. Transsexuality was virtually unknown of except for Christine Jorgenson's name for the most part. That and those of us that knew in our hearts we had been born wrong.

Gays as Capucine described it was accurate. There were Laws against most sexual encounters outside the privacy of ones home. Sadly in retrospect, I actually charged two gay men with sodomy in the early 1970's while a Police Officer after finding them engaged on a City Street. A blind eye was usually turned if they kept out of the public sector.

Re: My son, the daughter [message #111193 is a reply to message #111186 ] Fri, 27 August 2010 20:07 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Hilary  is currently offline Hilary  UNITED KINGDOM
Messages: 5534
Registered: October 2007
Location: 2, Camberwick Green, Trum...
Senior Member
BL Administrator (Retired)
BL3d
Ah, the '60s. A lot changed.

The Pill, the mini-skirt, women's lib, equality acts, being divorced was a disgrace, signs saying 'No Blacks or Irish', hippies, counter culture


Go back far enough and we have witch burning and the Spanish Inquisition.

The move to liberalism is nothing new, but it did (seem to) speed up in the '60s.
Re: My son, the daughter [message #111243 is a reply to message #111071 ] Sat, 28 August 2010 15:47 Go to previous messageGo to next message
pumpkin  is currently offline pumpkin  UNITED STATES
Messages: 662
Registered: July 2009
Senior Member
Thank you so much for the wonderful stories and reflections girls, please tell me more Smile
I was reading about Candy Darling (a trans woman actress who belonged to Andy Warhol's Factory group), which was about the same time, and thinking how extraordinarily difficult it was for anyone to take you seriously and not just some sort of perv against whom all kinds of off-the-books violence, discrimination and derision were warranted.

(Candy's the one with the red bandanna)


[Updated on: Sat, 28 August 2010 15:48]

Re: My son, the daughter [message #111753 is a reply to message #111071 ] Thu, 02 September 2010 12:37 Go to previous message
CarolynnL  is currently offline CarolynnL  UNITED STATES
Messages: 1817
Registered: October 2007
Location: Central Time Zone
Senior Member
1966, I was on my first tour of Vietnam. Hot, miserable, boring with flashes of terror, but I had a copy of the Transsexual Phenomenon I bought before leaving San Diego. It was well thumbed by the time I passed it on.

Didn't see those little cartoons. We would occasionally get Nurse Nelly cartoon books.

Every time I returned home I experienced culture shock as the clothes changed a lot, the tenor of the movies changed to the anti-hero hero, and the virtual end of burlesque happened. It had lasted longer in San Diego than anywhere else on the west coast. All the strippers were getting sooo long in the tooth (and the sag), and comics too, though the sexual innuendo still sparked a laugh from the mostly stoned audience.

Belly dancing was in vogue, and a dancer lived next door to me at the apartment complex where I was sharing an apartment with a coworker while we were home. Needed somewhere to get away from the damned military bull crap. She practiced by the pool often, and I was an appreciative audience of her talents. She was a good cook, and I could bake cake and southern style cornbread. Shared evening meals several times. Nice kid. A dance major at San Diego State. Danced at a couple of clubs with Mideast atmosphere and food to pay her way.

Then back to the frog ponds after a few months home. Stinking place.

Carolynn

[Updated on: Thu, 02 September 2010 12:38]

Previous Topic:Just the sort of news we don't need.
Next Topic:Christianity support bullying in schools
Goto Forum:
  


Current Time: Sat May 19 16:43:22 PDT 2012

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.02179 seconds
.:: Contact :: Home ::.

Powered by: FUDforum 2.8.1.
Copyright ©2001-2009 FUDforum Bulletin Board Software